← All systems

INSURAGENT · PROPERTY UNDERWRITING

A working agent with evidence at every boundary.

InsurAgent reads a property submission, retrieves internal context, checks external sources, calls deterministic rules and pricing, and prepares a decision for an underwriter. Its most important output is not prose—it is reviewable state.

VALIDATED SYNTHETIC RUN CASE 01
InsurAgent interface showing a property pricing result.
TRACE STEPS57
ERROR CODES0
FINAL CONTROLHuman

THE RUNTIME

One workflow. Four distinct responsibilities.

The model is used for interpretation and planning. Business-critical evaluation stays behind typed tools, versioned packages and explicit governance gates.

01GROUND

Read the evidence

Extract facts with source references, missing-field state and contradictions.

02CHECK

Retrieve context

Search policy, customer, sanctions, company and hazard sources through bounded tools.

03EXECUTE

Call the rules

Send controlled inputs to deterministic appetite, authority and rating services.

04DECIDE

Hand control back

Prepare a recommendation and preserve the final decision for the underwriter.

RUN EVIDENCE

Three scenarios designed to expose failure modes.

These are synthetic property submissions. They demonstrate system behaviour; they are not claims about production accuracy or commercial underwriting outcomes.

01

Clean, rateable submission

AUD 12,240 technical premium

The evidence is sufficient to execute the property rules and return a reviewable price.

02

Conflicting sprinkler evidence

Conflict retained for review

The agent does not silently choose between the proposal and the supporting schedule.

03

Non-rateable construction

No invented premium

A missing rule match becomes an explicit gap instead of an improvised pricing answer.

Risk review showing contradictory sprinkler evidence.
CASE 02 · EVIDENCEThe contradiction survives extraction
Authority review showing the case requires a higher authority level.
CASE 02 · GOVERNANCEAuthority is evaluated independently

REPLAY THE SYSTEM

Inspect the interface and the trace.

The walkthrough shows the authenticated product surface. The evidence replay focuses on the state that supports review and diagnosis.

PRODUCT WALKTHROUGHAuthenticated live UI
TECHNICAL REPLAYEvidence and trace overview

DESIGN POSITION

Useful precisely because it knows where to stop.

01
Unknown is a valid state

Missing evidence is never promoted into a business fact merely to complete an output.

02
Fallbacks remain visible

A degraded search or unavailable pricing service is recorded rather than disguised.

03
Rules keep their provenance

Document-derived rules must preserve their source, review state and version.

04
The underwriter owns the decision

The system can recommend, refer and explain. It cannot silently assume authority.

REPRODUCIBLE INPUTS

Review the synthetic source documents.

The public cases use deliberately fabricated businesses and insurance details.

PRIVATE DEMO

Test it against a workflow you understand.

Share the kind of documents, rules or underwriting boundary you want to examine. A useful demo starts with a concrete failure mode.

Completing security check…